The x402 Index · Fortnightly

Settlement value contracts as the machine-scale ticket mix thins

Settlement read 2026-08-15
Base chain · window 2026-08-02 to 2026-08-15 · built 2026-08-16 00:07:34 UTC
Data refreshed nightly · next issue due Saturday 29 August 2026
Authorizations163.9 millionSettled · all-time$97.0MSettled · fortnight$489kValue · Δ2wk-22%Named · tier A0.005%Live endpoints32

Settled value fell -22% to $489k even as payment count rose +17%, with the cent-to-dime bucket shedding -6.3 pts of weekly count share.

  • Value down, count up: settled USDC fell -22% to $489k while settlements rose +17% to 3.7 million.
  • Ticket mix shifted: the cent-to-dime bucket’s share of weekly payment count fell -6.3 pts versus four weeks prior.
  • Buyers still outnumber sellers: 36,036 distinct buyer wallets versus 13,699 seller addresses in the window.
  • Naming remains near-zero: only 0.005% of all-time value lands at a probed, nameable address; tier-B facilitators still relay 96.7% of count.

Count expands, value contracts

The fortnight 2026-08-02 to 2026-08-15 printed a clean divergence. Settlement count across tiers A and B rose +17% to 3.7 million, yet settled value fell -22% to $489k. That is the clearest signal in the tape: more authorizations, thinner average tickets.

Active participation stayed broad. Distinct buyer wallets summed to 36,036 across the fourteen days; seller addresses summed to 13,699. The buyer-to-seller skew is structural, not a one-week artifact. Cumulative protocol history now stands at 163.9 million EIP-3009 authorizations and $97.0M settled, so the fortnight’s value pullback is a mix shift inside a still-growing base, not a collapse of the rail.

Payments per day
Daily settlement — count and value01.2M2.5M3.8M5.0M2025-03-242025-08-192025-12-172026-04-162026-08-14Daily settlement — count and value. Y-axis to 5.0M. Payments/day: latest 375k, peak 4.0M, low 1, 482 points.
Settled value per day
Settled value per day (USDC)01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M2025-03-242025-08-192025-12-172026-04-162026-08-14Settled value per day (USDC). Y-axis to 4.0M. Settled $/day: latest 25k, peak 3.1M, low 0, 482 points.

Cent-to-dime loses share

The ticket that moved hardest was cent-to-dime. Its share of weekly payment count fell -6.3 pts against the level four weeks earlier. That bucket sits inside the machine-scale tail: all-time, payments of a dime or less still account for 72.3% of count, while tickets of one hundred dollars or more still carry 29.7% of value. The latest move compresses the middle of the small-ticket band without handing share to the large-ticket end.

When count rises and value falls in the same window, the arithmetic points to more sub-dime and near-dime flow relative to anything that clears a dollar. The structure chart remains the cleanest read on where the money actually sits versus where the pings land.

Count share vs value share, by ticket size
Where the money is: count share vs value share0%19%38%56%75%<$.01$.01–.1$.1–1$1–10$10–100$100+Share of countShare of valueWhere the money is: count share vs value share. Share of count vs Share of value across 6 buckets. <$.01: 33% vs 0%; $.01–.1: 39% vs 2%; $.1–1: 15% vs 6%; $1–10: 13% vs 51%; $10–100: 0% vs 10%; $100+: 0% vs 30%.

Facilitation dense, names scarce

Confidence mix barely budged. Detected facilitators still intermediate the overwhelming majority of flow: tier B holds 96.7% of all-time settlement count. Named, probed payees remain a rounding error at 0.005% of cumulative value. Live endpoints answering a payment challenge stand at 32, matching the current registry print of 32.

The research queue is still dominated by unknowns. The single largest uncatalogued earner is an unnamed wallet, which has taken 12.4 million payments and $11.5M in value—the top of a list that now holds 40 addresses above the earning threshold. Another 3.78% of payments move through proxies where the ultimate payee cannot be read. Until those wallets are mapped, headline value will continue to look larger than any directory of services.

Confidence mix over time
Confidence mix over time0%25%50%75%100%2025-03-172025-07-212025-11-242026-03-302026-08-03Tier ATier BTier CTier DConfidence mix over time. 74 columns, each 100%. Final mix: Tier A 0%, Tier B 97%, Tier C 0%, Tier D 2%.
Share of value we can name
Share of value we can name (%)0.00%0.01%0.03%0.04%0.05%2025-032025-072025-112026-032026-07Share of value we can name (%). Y-axis to 0.05%. Named %: latest 0.05%, peak 0.05%, low 0.00%, 18 points.

What matters into the next print

Two numbers set the agenda for the issue due Saturday 29 August 2026. First, whether the cent-to-dime share stabilizes or keeps giving up ground—another leg lower would confirm that incremental agent traffic is migrating into still-smaller tickets. Second, whether settled value can re-accelerate without a return of large single-wallet days; the historical spike template remains 2025-11-03, when 3.4 million settlements and $3.1M printed with 33% of that day’s value from an unnamed contract. Underlying chain extracts refresh nightly; the desk will treat any re-widening of average ticket as the first sign the value line is healing.

The next issue

Delivered every second Saturday. One click to join, one click to leave — the list lives with every other RoboMacro note, and each email carries its own unsubscribe link.

Subscribe on /notes
Already subscribed? Every issue we send has a one-click unsubscribe in its header and footer.